NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Cain [2013] NSWDC 68 Hearing dates: 22, 23 May 2013 Decision date: 23 May 2013 Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Order of the Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal dated 19 November 2012 set aside. (3) An order pursuant to s 91(1)(a) and (3) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 terminating the residential tenancy agreement between the plaintiff as landlord and the defendant as tenant in respect of the premises at 28/129 Bundock Street, Coogee with immediate effect. (4) An order in favour of the plaintiff pursuant to s 91(1)(a) and (3) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 for possession of the premises at 28/129 Bundock Street, Coogee with immediate effect. (5) Order (1) - (4) stayed for 28 days. (6) Exhibits returned. Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT - appeal from CTTT - tenant pleads guilty to offences of drug supply under Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) - landlord gives tenant termination notice under s 91(1)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) - CTTT refuses to terminate the tenancy as it may hinder the tenant from completing health and rehabilitation programmes which were part of her sentencing - whether s 91(1)(a) mandatory - whether Tribunal Member had a discretion to exercise - whether exercise of discretion erred Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 9(1) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 91, 115 and152 Residential Tenancies Bill 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Lincoln Industrial Cleaners Pty Ltd (1975) 2 NSWLR 499 Finance Facilities Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 127 CLR 106 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Houssein v Under Secretary, Department of Industrial Relations and Technology (NSW) (1982) 148 CLR 88 Howard v B Miles Womens Foundation Inc [2012] NSWSC 1173 Julius v Bishop of Oxford (1880) LR 5 AC 214 Leach v R (2007) 230 CLR 1 Lugg v Wright [1941] SASR 106 Lyford v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1995) 130 ALR 267 Mitchell v R (1996) 184 CLR 333 Owens v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1978) 46 FLR 16 Ward v Williams (1955) 92 CLR 496 Texts Cited: DC Pearce & RS Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (7th ed.) Residential Tenancies Bill 2010 (NSW) (Second Reading Speech, 8 June 2010) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation Defendant: Kerry Anne Cain Representation: Plaintiff: Mr R Ranken Defendant: Mr A K Flecknoe-Brown Plaintiff: Housing NSW Defendant: Tenants Union of NSW Co-op Ltd File Number(s): 2012/390440 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate