NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vourvahakis v Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre Pty Limited [2013] NSWDC 73 Hearing dates: 20-22, 26-28 February 2013 Decision date: 01 March 2013 Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: I give verdict and judgment for the first defendant against the plaintiff I give verdict and judgment for the second defendant against the plaintiff I order that the first cross-claim be dismissed I order that the second cross-claim be dismissed Catchwords: PERSONAL INJURY - Occupier's liability - First defendant owner and occupier of a shopping centre - Plaintiff slipped and fell whilst walking across a car park toward the entrance of the shopping centre - Second defendant alleged to be contracted by first defendant to provide inter alia occupational health and safety risk assessment - Whether second defendant owed a particular duty of care to the plaintiff - Plaintiff saw extending across the roadway in front of her an expansion joint cover which protruded from the road surface - Plaintiff stepped on expansion cover and fell - Plaintiff was wearing rubber thongs - Plaintiff admitted it was raining at the time - Plaintiff did not turn mind to whether expansion joint cover would be slippery - Plaintiff admitted that if she had turned her mind to the question of slipperiness she would not have stepped on it - Whether any legal impediment to the use of these expansion joint covers at the time that they were installed - Whether other persons had reported injury concerning slipping on expansion joint cover - Whether risk was foreseeable - Risk not insignificant - Whether risk of harm was remote - Question of seriousness of harm - Plaintiff affected by two previous motor vehicle accidents and a number of work-related injuries - Whether risk was obvious - Question of reasonable preventative measures Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Cases Cited: Australia in Australian Safeways Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 Bader v Jelic [2011] NSWCA 255 Brady v Girvan Bros Pty Ltd t/as Minto Mall (1986) 7 NSWLR 241 Garzo v Liverpool/Campbelltown Christian School [2012] NSWCA 151 Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614 Indermaur v Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175 Papantonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day [1998] HCA 3; 192 CLR 330 Shaw v Thomas [2010] NSWCA 169 Skulander v Willoughby City Council [2007] NSWCA 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stella Vourvahakis (Plaintiff) Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Mr G Beauchamp (Plaintiff) Mr G Guest (Defendant) Brydens Compensation Lawyers (Plaintiff) McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/426729
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate