NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brett STAAS [2012] NSWDC 287 Decision date: 28 June 2012 Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Convicted of conspiracy to manufacture a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) in an amount not less than indictable quantity; supply prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) in the indictable quantity; solicit to manufacture a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) in an amount not less than the commercial quantity. Aggregate sentence imposed: 4 years, 10 months imprisonment, non-parole period 2 years, 2 months, balance 2 years, 8 months. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Particular offences - drug offences - offender sourced chemicals in a conspiracy to manufacture methylamphetamine - solicited undercover operative to cook methylamphetamine -supplied methylamphetamine to undercover operative - Sentence - parity - offender original and primary participant in conspiracy - role equal to co-conspirator McGregor - non-parole period - special circumstances found - hardship to family - precarious psychological health of teenage daughter - capacity of her sole guardian (grandmother) to continue care due to several chronic health conditions - need for offender to continue rehabilitation - no significant prior convictions - good prospects of rehabilitation - general deterrence important regarding supply offence - specific deterrence - unlikely to re-offend - employed and remarried. Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 24(1), 24(2), 25(1), 39P Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 53A Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Brett Staas (Offender) Representation: Counsel: M Barr (Crown) H K Dhanji SC (Offender) File Number(s): DC 2009/42332 Publication restriction: A pseudonym has been used to protect the identity of the offender's young daughter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate