NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Semaan v Poidevin (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 694 Hearing dates: 13 December 2012, subsequent written submissions of 31 January 2013 and further hearing on 6 March 2013 Decision date: 03 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: Amendment to reasons within power Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES - capacity of Court to correct reasons for judgment for slip and/or ambiguity - correction made after judgment entered; APPEAL - reasons for judgment - slip and/or ambiguity - judgment already entered - capacity of Court to alter wording - correction made to reasons for judgment - superior court of record - power in criminal proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; (2008) 238 CLR 218 Elliott v The Queen; Blessington v The Queen [2007] HCA 51; (2007) 234 CLR 38 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Lines MacFarlane Marshall Pty Ltd [2001] VSCA 167; (2001) 4 VR 28 Grierson v The King [1938] HCA 45; (1938) 60 CLR 431 R v Glyn Morgan JONES; R v Anthony Joseph Luis HILI (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 195 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Richard Semaan (Plaintiff) Sergeant Damien Poidevin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Dennis (Plaintiff) N Adams SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/149182 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9109 Date of Decision: 2012-04-04 00:00:00 Before: Connell LCM File Number(s): 2012/149182
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate