NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Al-Shennag v Woodcock [2013] NSWSC 696 Hearing dates: 8 December 2011, submissions and further evidence closed 22 February 2012 Decision date: 03 June 2013 Before: McCallum J Decision: Proceedings dismissed Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application to have proceedings dismissed for failure to comply with directions and want of due despatch - where plaintiff representing self - numerous ill-conceived interlocutory applications and extensions of timetable Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Defamation Act 1974 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1226 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Ltd [2008] NSWCA 300 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Ltd [2009] HCASL 155 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Ltd [2010] NSWSC 760 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 210 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 366 Al-Shennag v Statewide Roads Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1412 A-S v Statewide Roads Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1472 Birkett v James [1977] 2 All ER 801; [1978] AC 297 Hoser v Hartcher [1999] NSWSC 527 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Abdullah Al-Shennag (plaintiff) Statewide Roads (first defendant) Bill Woodcock (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: M White (defendants) Solicitors: (Plaintiff self-represented) Norton Rose (defendants) File Number(s): 2005/269387 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate