NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 11) [2013] NSWLEC 81 Hearing dates: 27, 28 and 29 May 2013 Decision date: 29 May 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: Application for recusal refused with costs. Exhibits to be returned. Catchwords: PROCEDURE: application for recusal on the grounds of actual and apprehended bias - applicable principles - no apprehended bias - no actual bias - application refused. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 76A, 96 Cases Cited: Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Lane Cove Council v Ross [2012] NSWLEC 153 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 160 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 171 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 191 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 5) [2013] NSWLEC 17 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 6) [2013] NSWLEC 74 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 8) [2013] NSWLEC 77 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 Ross v Lane Cove Council [2012] NSWLEC 1364 Spencer v Bamber [2012] NSWCA 274 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Lane Cove Council (Applicant) Mr Raymond Ross (Respondent) Representation: Mr N Eastman (Applicant) Mr R Ross (in person) (Respondent) Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) N/A (Respondent) File Number(s): 41242 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate