NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ampcontrol SWG Pty Limited -v- Gujarat NRE Wonga Pty Limited (formerly Gujarat NRE FCGL Pty Limited) [2013] NSWSC 707 Hearing dates: 29 May 2013 Decision date: 03 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Judgment for the plaintiff Catchwords: Building and Construction Industry - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act - Where claimant serves a payment claim for a progress payment which does not disclose the precise contractual provisions relied. Where defendant fails to serve a payment schedule and then opposes judgment being entered on the basis that the terms of the contract do not entitle the plaintiff to the progress payment claimed - sufficient for the plaintiff to make a claim - defendant could raise the contractual issue in a payment schedule or adjudication response but is not entitled to do so now Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Isis Projects v Clarence Street [2004] NSWSC 714 Consolidated Constructions v Ettamogah Pub [2004] NSWSC 110 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ampcontrol SWG Pty Limited ACN 001 737 533 - Plaintiff Gujarat NRE Wonga Pty Limited ACN 111 928 762 - Defendant Representation: Counsel: D.S. Weinberger - Plaintiff B.J. Gillard (Solicitor) - Defendant Solicitors: Ampcontrol Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Gillard Consulting Lawyers - Defendant File Number(s): 2013/54853
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate