NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Verzar v Verzar [2013] NSWCA 170 Hearing dates: 27 May 2013 Decision date: 12 June 2013 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: 1. The applicant's notice of motion filed 20 March 2013 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the motion. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - extension of time for filing notice of appeal - whether appeal fairly arguable - whether applicant had abandoned relief sought Legislation Cited: Probate and Administration Act 1898 Succession Act 2006 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Wills Probate Administration Act 1898 Cases Cited: Metwally v University of Wollongong [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 60 ALR 68 Nanschild v Pratt [2011] NSWCA 85 O'Brien v McCormick [2005] NSWSC 619 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71 NSWLR 61 Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Thomas John Verzar (Applicant) Susan Verzar (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Lakeman (Applicant) Mr R Wilson (Respondent) Solicitors: Denes Ebner Lawyers (Applicant) Teece Hodgson & Ward (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013 / 85245 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Citation: Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Date of Decision: 2012-11-16 00:00:00 Before: Lindsay J File Number(s): SC 2011/88252
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate