NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fu v Carmody [2013] NSWCA 172 Hearing dates: 7 June 2013 Decision date: 07 June 2013 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; [9]; [10] and [11] Leeming JA at [8] Decision: (1) The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. (2) The costs to which the respondent is entitled are assessed at the amount of $8,000. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - application for leave to appeal - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Quen Fu (Applicant) John Edward Carmody trading as Carmody & Co Solicitors (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C de Robilliard (Applicant) M Pesman (Respondent) Solicitors: Kent Attorneys (Applicant) John Carmody & Co Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2012/347360 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Fu v Carmody [2012] NSWSC 1362 Date of Decision: 2012-10-11 00:00:00 Before: Adams J File Number(s): 2012/164207
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate