NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Naden [2013] NSWSC 759 Hearing dates: 22 April 2013, 2 May 2013, 9 May 2013 Decision date: 14 June 2013 Before: Price J Decision: See paragraph 155 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - two murders - shooting with intent to murder - whether worst category - aggravated indecent assault - break enter and commit serious indictable offences - utilitarian discount for guilty plea - whether mental disorder - no remorse - future dangerousness - whether life sentence should be imposed - totality Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 s 19A, s 29, s 61M(1), s 112(1)(a) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 21(1), s 21A(2)(k), s 21A(2)(ea), s 21A(2)(eb), s 21A(2)(m), s 21A(3)(b), s 23(1), s 23(2)(e), s 23(3), s 21A(3)(i), s 61(1) Cases Cited: Aslett v R [2006] NSWCCA 360 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 DS v R [2012] NSWCCA 159 Ibbs v The Queen [1987] HCA 46; (1987) 163 CLR 447 Knight v R [2006] NSWCCA 292; (2006) 164 A Crim R 126 Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189; (2007) 175 A Crim R 40 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Baker (NSWCCA, 20 Sep 1995, unreported) R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Harris [2000] NSWCCA 469; (2000) 50 NSWLR 409 R v Harrison (1997) 93 A Crim R 314 R v King [2003] NSWCCA 352 R v Lewis [2001] NSWCCA 448 R v Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19; (2004) 59 NSWLR 557 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Penisini [2004] NSWCCA 339 R v Phuong Canh Ngo (No 3) [2001] NSWSC 1021; (2001) 125 A Crim R 495 R v Ponfield [1999] NSWCCA; (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 R v Robinson [2002] NSWCCA 359 R v SLD [2003] NSWCCA 310; (2003) 58 NSWLR 589 R v Tadrosse [2005] NSWCCA 145; (2005) 65 NSWLR 740 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Yeo [2003] NSWSC 315 Suleman v R [2009] NSWCCA 70 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Sentence Parties: Crown Malcolm John Naden Representation: Counsel: Mr M Tedeschi QC (Crown) Mr Ierace SC (Accused) Mr R Wilson Solicitors: Office of Director of Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2012/91386 2012/91612 Publication restriction: This judgment has been amended in accordance with non-publication orders made on 22 April 2013.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate