NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LISA KAYE O'DONOGHUE v JET FIGHTER FLIGHTS PTY LTD (IN LIQ) [2013] NSWSC 781 Hearing dates: 7 June 2013 Decision date: 07 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Slattery J Decision: Settlement of the proceedings and the proposed apportionment of the settlement sum approved. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - deceased killed in a recreational flight accident - wife commenced action under Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 s 6B on behalf of herself and her children - proceedings settled - Court asked to apportion the settlement sum - proposed apportionment below the amounts allocated to each child by expert actuaries - whether the reduction appropriate - the wife already paid substantial costs of the inquest into the accident - the wife already paid expenses for the children's education and advancement in life - the children and the wife agree to the proposed apportionment - the children informed that they can receive independent legal advice and declined to do so - wife's position as a fiduciary for the children discussed - HELD: settlement sum apportioned in accordance with the proposal. PROCEDURE - action commenced on behalf of a person under legal incapacity - person ceased to be under legal incapacity - proceedings settled - Court approval of the settlement required under Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 76 - HELD: settlement approved. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 76 Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 s 6B Cases Cited: Elliott v The Public Trustee, Supreme Court of NSW, Court of Appeal (Unreported), 9 November 1981 Erwin v Shannon's Brick, Tile and Pottery Co. Limited (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 555 Haigh v State Government Insurance Office (Queensland) [1962] Qd R 534 Pobezin v Insurance Commissioner of the State Motor Car Insurance Office (1969) VR 682 Category: Separate question Parties: Lisa Kaye O'Donoghue Plaintiff Jet Fighter Flights Pty Ltd (in liq) (First Defendant) Aerospace Services Group Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Civil Aviation Safety Authority (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D. Kelly (Plaintiff) I. Harvey (Defendant) Solicitors: File Number(s): 2008/00289574; 2008/00289589
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate