NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Watson Road Moss Vale Developments Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 783 Hearing dates: 20 March 2013 Decision date: 20 March 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Defendant wound up in insolvency under s 459P Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Liquidator appointed to the defendant. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - winding up in insolvency - presumption of insolvency arising from non-compliance with a statutory demand.
PROCEDURE - service - whether statutory demand was served so as to give rise to a presumption of insolvency arising from non-compliance with it - where conflicting evidence about the sending and receipt of mail - where mail diverted from registered office to post office by arrangement between the company and the post office - whether evidence sufficient to raise doubt about the presumption that mail is received on the fourth business day after it was posted. Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 29 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 109X, 459C(2), 459P, 459Q, 459R Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 160 Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW) r 5.4(4) Cases Cited: - Bellway Corporation Pty Ltd v Ausdrill Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 1663 - Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clear Blue Developments Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1223 - Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Starpicket Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1196 - Formosa House Pty Ltd v Ming Chien Chang [2010] VSC 474 - Renegade Rigging Pty Ltd v Hanlon Nominees Pty Ltd [2010] VSC 385 - Scope Data Systems Pty Ltd v Gorman [2007] NSWSC 278; (2007) 70 NSWLR 176 - Steel Building Systems Pty Ltd v Beks Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1405 - Tomic Industries Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1478 Category: Principal judgment Parties: M & A Barlow and Co (Australia) Limited (Plaintiff) Watson Road Moss Vale Developments Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P. Rodionoff (Plaintiff) D.A. Allen (Defendant) Solicitors: Ai Strategic Lawyers (Plaintiff) Proctor & Associates (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/325986
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate