NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Waverley Council v Tovir Investments Pty Ltd & Rappaport (No 4) [2013] NSWLEC 88 Hearing dates: 17 June 2013 Decision date: 18 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Biscoe J Decision: (1) Respondent Tovir Investments Pty Ltd is fined $40,000 apportioned as follows: (a) $20,000 for its contempt relating to 6 Kent Street, Waverley; (b) $20,000 for its contempt relating to 34 Imperial Avenue, Bondi. (2) Respondent Michael Rappaport is fined the sum of $4,000 apportioned as follows: (a) $2,000 for his contempt relating to 6 Kent street, Waverley; (b) $2,000 for his contempt relating to 34 Imperial Avenue, Bondi. (3) Respondents are to pay the applicant's costs. Catchwords: CONTEMPT - sentencing for disobeying Court orders not to cause or permit premises to be used for purpose of backpackers accommodation as defined in Waverley Local Environmental Plan 1996 - relevance of mental condition to sentencing. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 3A Waverley Local Environmental Plan 1996 Cases Cited: Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 at [33] - [34] Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Liverpool City Council v Palerma Pty Ltd and Parilo (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 45 Matthews v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2009] NSWCA 155 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 20 Pittwater Council v Brown Brothers Waste Contractors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 210 Queanbeyan City Council v Sun (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 64 R v Bugmy [2012] NSWCCA 223 R v Verdins; R v Buckley; R v Vo [2007] VSCA 102,16 VR 269 Ryan v R [2001] HCA 21, 206 CLR 267 Waverley Council v Tovir Investments Pty Ltd & Rappaport (No 3) [2013] NSWLEC 35 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (19960 86 A Crim R 183 Category: Sentence Parties: Waverley Council (Applicant) Tovir Investments Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Michael Rappaport (Second Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: T Howard (Applicant) A Gruzman (Respondents) SOLICITORS: Sparke Helmore (Applicant) Boskovitz & Associates (Respondents) File Number(s): 40917/10 and 40918/10
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate