NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zarakas v R [2013] NSWCCA 144 Hearing dates: 4 February 2013 Decision date: 19 June 2013 Before: Latham J at [1] Button J at [2] Grove AJ at [59] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal out of time granted. (2) Leave to appeal granted. (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - whether sentencing process offended Muldrock v The Queen - whether sentence imposed demonstrated erroneous disparity with co-offender - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Atchison v R [2012] NSWCCA 82 Dionys v R [2011] NSWCCA 272 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 Stewart v R [2012] NSWCCA 183 Truong v R; R v Le; Nguyen v R; R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 36 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Zarakas (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (applicant) R Herps (respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2009/192665 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-11-26 00:00:00 Before: Delaney DCJ File Number(s): 2009/192665
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate