NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) [2013] NSWSC 811 Hearing dates: 5 April 2013 Decision date: 21 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: Order that the plaintiff pay the defendant a specified gross sum of $294,226.36 instead of assessed costs Catchwords: COSTS - claim for a specified gross sum instead of assessed costs under Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(4)(c) - unsuccessful plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's costs - plaintiff unlikely to be able to pay assessed costs - whether a specified gross sum order under s 98(4)(c) is appropriate. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(4)(c) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 s 20 Cases Cited: Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1995) 57 FCR 119 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Harrison v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 3) [2013] NSWSC 351 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond [2012] NSWSC 675 Starr-Diamond v Diamond [2013] NSWCA 7. Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1650 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff:- Simone Starr-Diamond Defendant:- Talus Diamond Representation: Counsel: Defendant: Solicitors: Defendant:- S. Hodges File Number(s): 2008/278342
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate