NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AB v Constable Joshua Hedges & Anor [2013] NSWSC 814 Hearing dates: Thursday 23 August 2012 Decision date: 21 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Application for judicial review dismissed Catchwords: COSTS - summary criminal proceedings - costs order against prosecutor purportedly by consent - whether order validly set aside by magistrate - whether consent order for costs against public prosecutor appropriate Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 - Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: - V (a child) v Constable Joshua Hedges [2011] NSWSC 232 - Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 - Cameron v Cole (1943) 68 CLR 571 - Taylor v Taylor (1978 - 79) 143 CLR 1 - Harvey v Philips (1956) 95 CLR 235 - Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 Category: Costs Parties: AB (plaintiff) Constable Joshua Hedges (1st defendant) Magistrate Albert Sbrizzi (2nd defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Coles QC & P Conway (plaintiff) M Hutchings (1st defendant) Submitting appearance (2nd defendant) Solicitors: Mr Emanueli Oliveri, Oliveri Lawyers (plaintiff) Phillip Salem, Sparke Helmore Lawyers (1st defendant) IV Knight, Crown Solicitor (2nd defendant) File Number(s): 2012/76236 Publication restriction: Yes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate