NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Subramaniam v R [2013] NSWCCA 159 Hearing dates: 27 March 2013 Decision date: 03 July 2013 Before: Emmett JA at 1 Simpson J at 14 Latham J at 15 Decision: Appeal allowed. Sentence imposed 10 February 2012 quashed. In lieu impose aggregate non-parole period of six (6) years to date from 4 October 2009, expiring 3 October 2015 with a balance of five (5) years expiring 3 October 2020. Applicant eligible for release on 4 October 2015 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - leave to appeal against sentence - aggregate sentence - obtain benefit by deception offences - money laundering offences - sentencing judge erred in application of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 53A - sentencing remarks provide no insight into calculation of sentence - must consider criminality of each offence in imposing aggregate sentence - obtain financial benefit offences involving transfer of funds of similar order ought to be grouped together - money laundering offences within "highly technical" category - restitution is an expression of applicant's remorse - finding of special circumstances - re-sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Job v R [2011] NSWCCA 267 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Phelan v R (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Conway [2001] NSWCCA 51 ; 121 A Crim R 177 R v Giallussi [1999] NSWCCA 56 R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 R v Strano [2002] NSWCCA 531 Thewlis v R [2008] NSWCCA 176 Thorn v R [2009] NSWCCA 294 Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 172 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 23 November 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rajina Subramaniam - Applicant Regina - Crown Respondent Representation: Counsel T Game SC / S Beckett - Applicant R Herps - Crown Respondent Solicitors Horowitz & Bilinsky - Applicant S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2009/221168 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-02-10 00:00:00 Before: Finnane SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/221168
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate