NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mike George Planning Pty Limited v Woollahra Municipal Council [2013] NSWLEC 97 Hearing dates: 14 June 2013 Decision date: 14 June 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: (1) I recuse myself from the further hearing of this appeal. (2) I give leave to the parties to approach the Registrar forthwith to obtain a new hearing date. Catchwords: APPEAL - appeal against Commissioner's decision on questions of law - application for recusal of judge on the basis of apprehended bias - whether there was a matter that could be said to lead judge to decide matter other than on its legal and factual merits - whether there was a connection between any such matter and the feared deviation from the course of deciding the matter other than on its legal and factual merits - judge had previously determined different proceedings between the same parties - judge previously inspected site subject to current proceedings and accepted evidence of applicant's neighbours that was adverse to applicant's case - no logical connection between these matters and questions of law raised on appeal - Council submitted that if errors of law found, there was no utility in remitting matter to Commissioner because of findings on merit issues - logical connection found between matters raised by applicant and question of remittal -fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to question of remittal - judge recuses himself Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 97 Cases Cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mike George Planning Pty Limited (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr M V Sahade (Barrister) (Applicant) Mr P R Rigg (Solicitor) (Respondent) Oliveri Solicitors (Applicant) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 10005 of 2013 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate