Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd [2013] NSWCA 214

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd [2013] NSWCA 214 Hearing dates: 1 July 2013 Decision date: 01 July 2013 Before: McColl JA Decision: See paragraph 10 [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - service - whether service of notice of motion by post sufficient service - UCPR 10.6(2) Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Rules Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Dr Vito Zepinic - first applicant/first respondent on the motion Milla Zepinic - second applicant/second respondent on the motion Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd - respondent/applicant on the motion Representation: Counsel: Applicants/respondents on the motion - no appearance B Ilkovski - respondent/applicant on the motion Solicitors: Applicants/respondents on the motion - no appearance Toomey Pegg Lawyers - respondent/applicant on the motion File Number(s): CA 2010/45208 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Citation: Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd Date of Decision: 2009-11-20 00:00:00 Before: Colefax DCJ File Number(s): DC 2009/2002