NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mamfredas Investment Group Pty Limited (formerly known as MAM Marketing Pty Ltd) v PropertyIT and Consulting Pty Limited & Ors [2013] NSWSC 929 Hearing dates: 30 November 2012 Decision date: 12 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: Restriction as to user extinguished. Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: PROPERTY - restriction as to user over parking spaces in strata building - use limited to owners or occupiers of adjoining building - restriction registered before adjoining building developed - adjoining building ultimately developed with its own parking spaces - owner of parking spaces seeks extinguishment of restriction under Conveyancing Act 1919 s 89 - all but three of the owners benefiting from restriction signed releases - three remaining owners filed submitting appearances. COSTS - plaintiff successful on its application under Conveyancing Act 1919 s 89 - plaintiff and defendants involved in lengthy negotiations before proceedings commenced - defendants' filed submitting appearances "save as to costs" under UCPR r 6.11 - whether plaintiff should pay defendants' costs - or whether defendants should pay plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis - whether proceedings should have been commenced ex parte. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 s 89(a), s 88(2)(d), s 88(3A), s 88B Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 6.11, 42.1 Cases Cited: Armishaw v Denby Horton (NZ) Ltd [1984] 1 NZLR 44 Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) v Krecichwost (2008) 72 NSWLR 498 Brown v STA of NSW [2000] NSWSC 802 Castagna v Great Wall Resources Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 942 Castle Constructions Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 1143, (2009) 75 NSWLR 629 Cummins v Mackenzie (1979) 2 NSWLR 803 Develtor Property Group Pty Ltd v Newcastle City Council [2001] NSWLEC 47 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Ltd [2000] 10 BPR 18,099; [2000] NSWCA 28 El Deeb v Magistrates Court of South Australia (1999) 72 SASR 596 Filter v Public Trustee [2007] NSWSC 1487, Sahab Holdings Pty Limited v Registrar-General Fordham v Fordyce [2007] NSWCA 129 Frasers Lorne Pty Ltd v Joyce Goldsworthy Burke & Ors [2008] NSWSC 743 Frasers Lorne Pty Ltd v Joyce Goldsworthy Burke & Ors [2008] NSWSC 743 Hardie v Cuthbert (No 2) (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, 31 May 1988, Young J) Heaton v Loblay (1960) SR (NSW) 332 In re Truman, Hanbury, Buxton & Company Ltd's Application [1956] 1 QB 261 Manfred Paul Radandt & Anor v Gary Daniel O'Toole [2006] NSWSC 721 Marian Walker v Brian Bridgewood and Ors (No 2) [2006] NSWSC 284 Markos v OR Autor Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 810 Pieper v Edwards [1982] 1 NSWLR 336 Re Ghey & Galton's Application [1957] 2 QB 650 Re Henderson's Conveyance [1940] Ch 835 Castagna v Great Wall Resources Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 942 Re Mason and the Conveyancing Act (1960) 78 WN (NSW) 925 Re Rose Bay Bowling & Recreation Club Ltd (1935) 52 WN (NSW) 77 Re Roseblade; Re Foenander [1964 -5] NSWR 2044 Re Withers [1970] VR 319 Ryan v Sutherland [2011] NSWSC 1397 Stanhill Pty Ltd v Jackson [2005] VSC 355 Takchi Bros Constructions Pty Ltd v Woods [2010] NSWSC 115 TZ Developments Pty Ltd v Rickman Pty Ltd 7 BPR 14,605 Willesee v Willesee (1974) 2 NSWLR 275 Texts Cited: Court Forms, Precedents & Pleadings NSW, LexisNexis, Sydney, 1989 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff:- Mamfredas Investment Group Pty Limited (formerly known as MAM Marketing Pty Limited) First Defendant:- PropertyIT and Consulting Pty Limited Second Defendant:- John Emanuel Lutman Third Defendant:- Jennifer Julie Game Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff:- T. A. Berberian First Defendant:- P.B. Walsh Second Defendant:- submitting appearance Third Defendant:- submitting appearance Solicitors: Plaintiff:- Martin Deutsch, Colin Biggers & Paisley First Defendant:- David Mark Crompton, Church & Grace Second Defendant:- submitting appearance Third Defendant:- submitting appearance File Number(s): 2012/292243 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate