NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ross v Lane Cove Council [2013] NSWLEC 109 Hearing dates: 16 July 2013 Decision date: 17 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Biscoe J Decision: Respondent's notice of motion filed on 26 February 2013 is dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS - Discontinued Class 1 appeal against refusal of an application to modify a development consent - whether applicant should pay respondent council's costs - costs principles on discontinuance of planning appeals. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 76A(1)(a), 96,149D Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 rr 3.7(2), 3.7(3) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.19, Schedule 1 Cases Cited: ACM Landmark Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2006] NSWLEC 256 Arden Anglican School v Hornsby Shire Council [2008] NSWLEC 103, (2008) 158 LGERA 224 Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70
Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 191 Lane Cove Council v Ross (No 14) [2013] NSWLEC 87 Manly Warringah Rugby League Club Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2006] NSWLEC 88 Ross v Lane Cove Council [2012] NSWLEC 1364 Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2006] NSWLEC 140 Category: Costs Parties: Raymond Ross (Applicant) Lane Cove Council (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: N Hogan (Applicant) N Eastman (Respondent) SOLICITORS: Duncan Scott (Applicant) Pikes & Verekers (Respondent) File Number(s): 11079/12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate