NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kristi Anne Abrahams [2013] NSWSC 952 Hearing dates: 24, 25 and 27 June 2013 Decision date: 18 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Harrison J Decision: For the offence of improperly interfering with the body of the deceased Kiesha Weippeart, sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 18 months commencing on 22 April 2011 expiring on 21 October 2012. For the offence of the murder of Kiesha Weippeart, sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 21 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 15 years commencing on 22 April 2012 expiring on 21 April 2027 with a balance of term of 6 years and 6 months commencing on 22 April 2027 expiring on 21 October 2033. The aggregate sentence is one of 22 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 16 years. The first day upon which the offender will become eligible for release on parole is 22 April 2027. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - murder of six year old child by mother - precise time and cause of death unknown - plea of guilty and admission of act causing death - where finding beyond reasonable doubt of infliction of fatal injuries with intention of causing grievous bodily harm - failure to seek medical treatment - middle range of objective seriousness for murder of its type - where offender has history of violent and dysfunctional childhood and intellectual disability - additional offence of improper treatment of body of the deceased - most serious category for such an offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: Apps v R [2006] NSWCCA 290 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 Hinchcliffe v R [2010] NSWCCA 306 Knight v R [2006] NSWCCA 292; (2006) 164 A Crim R 126 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mitchell v R [2010] NSWCCA 145 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v F.A.P. [2007] NSWSC 905 R v Ha [2008] NSWSC 1368 R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209; (2000) 112 A Crim R 466 R v O'Brien [2003] NSWCCA 121 R v Sam [2011] NSWCCA 36 R v Turchino [2005] NSWSC 1214 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Wilkinson [1999] NSWCCA 248 SW v R [2013] NSWCCA 103 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 Tran, Hoai Vinh v R [2011] NSWCCA 116 Wood v R [2012] NSWCCA 21 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Kristi Anne Abrahams (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Maxwell QC (Crown) J Manuell SC (Accused) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Armstrong Legal (Accused) File Number(s): 2011/133212 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate