NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blackstock v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 172 Hearing dates: 30/04/13 Decision date: 23 July 2013 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Campbell J at [2] Barr AJ at [70] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney Generals Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868; 1 QB 73 Jaturawong v. Regina [2011] NSWCCA 168 Phelan v R (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 Question of Law Reserved (No. 2 of 1996) (1996) 67 SASR 63; 88 A Crim R 417 R v Bembridge (1783) 3 Dougl 327 R v El-Rashid (NSWCCA, unreported 7th April 1995; BC9504681) R v Hawkins (1989) 45 A Crim R 430 R v Hokin, Burton and Peisley (1922) 22 SR (NSW) 280 R v Mungomery [2004] NSWCCA 450; 151 A Crim R 376 R. v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R. v. Quach [2010] VSCA 106; 27 VR 310 Shum Kwok Sher v HKSAR (2002) 5 HKCFAR 381 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allen Michael Blackstock (applicant) Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Porter (applicant) N Bruni (respondent) Solicitors: Adams & Partners (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2011/96482 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-02-24 00:00:00 Before: Judge Woods QC File Number(s): 2011/96482
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate