NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re June [2013] NSWSC 969 Hearing dates: 09/07/2013 Decision date: 09 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Orders of Children's Court quashed. Remit matter to be heard according to law and by a different magistrate. Catchwords: CHILD WELFARE - care proceedings - application by foster carers challenging decision of the Children's Court - whether magistrate erred in failing to admit relevant evidence - where unadmitted evidence raised significant issues - need to weigh advantages of admitting probative evidence against disadvantages of admitting improperly obtained evidence - whether magistrate failed to comply with s 9(2)(c) of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) - whether magistrate failed to properly apply s 79(3) of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) - where indication that magistrate regarded time as a dispositive consideration in decisions to admit evidence
CHILD WELFARE - care proceedings - where an Act confers opportunity to be heard on matters of significant impact - whether foster carers were entitled to that opportunity - what constitutes an opportunity to be heard - Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) s 87
CHILD WELFARE - care proceedings - whether foster carers have standing to seek relief under s 69 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) - if not, whether manifest defects in hearing before and reasons of Children's Court constitute "exceptional circumstances" - whether Supreme Court may, in the exercise of parens patriae jurisdiction, grant relief under s 69 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: Maksimovic v Walsh [1983] 2 NSWLR 656 Re Bailey & Blake (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 394 Re Kerry (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 127 Re Tracey [2011] NSWCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Foster Father (First Plaintiff) Foster Mother (Second Plaintiff) Director General, Department of Family and Community Services (First Defendant) Father (Second Defendant) Child (Third Defendant) Mother (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M W Anderson / J Longworth (Plaintiffs) G W Moore / V Tzatzagos (First Defendant) L J Sproston (Second and Fourth Defendants) C Spain (Independent Legal Representative) Solicitors: Neil Jones Solicitors (Plaintiffs) NSW Crown Solicitors (First Defendant) Thompson Madden Solicitors (Second and Fourth Defendant) Longman Hill Solicitors (Independent Legal Representative) File Number(s): 2013/199535
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate