NSW Caselaw
Children's Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DFaCS (NSW) and Abbey [2013] NSWChC 3 Hearing dates: 16 and 18 April at Bidura and 5 June 2013 at Parramatta Decision date: 19 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Care and protection Before: Judge Peter Johnstone, President of the Children's Court of New South Wales Decision: There is no realistic possibility of restoration to the mother or the father. The permanency planning for the child has been appropriately and adequately addressed. Catchwords: CHILDREN - Care and Protection - parental responsibility - permanency planning - realistic possibility of restoration - contact Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Director-General of Department of Community Services; Re "Sophie" [2008] NSWCA 250 In the matter of Campbell [2011] NSWSC 761 Johnson v Page [2007] Fam CA 1235 M v M [1988] HCA 68Re Tracey [2011] NSWCA 43 The Department of Community Services v "Rachel Grant", "Tracy Reid", "Sharon Reid and "Frank Reid" [2010] CLN 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Department of Family and Community Services (DFaCS) The Mother The Father Representation: Ms Collopy, solicitor (Department) Ms Wells, solicitor (Mother) Mr Braine of counsel (Father) Mr Whelan, solicitor, independent legal representative for the child File Number(s): 2013/252 Publication restriction: Pseudonyms have been used in order to anonymise the child and parties
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate