NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Department of Education and Communities [2013] NSWADT 162 Hearing dates: 15, 16 and 17 May 2013 Decision date: 22 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Equal Opportunity Division Before: R J Wright SC, Judicial Member A Lowe, Non-Judicial Member N Hiffernan, Non-Judicial Member Decision: The Tribunal: Finds the complaint substantiated in that the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the complainant on the ground of disability in contravention of s 49D(2)(b) and (d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act (NSW) 1977 by refusing to permit him to return work and earn his income on 9 August 2010 because satisfactory return to work arrangements were not in place; Orders the respondent to pay the complainant damages in the sum of $40,500; Orders that the complaint be otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: Disability Discrimination - Employment - Direct Discrimination Legislation Cited: Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Cases Cited: Commissioner of Corrective Services ats Aldridge [2000] NSWADTAP 5 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2000] NSWADT 133 Abdulrahman v Toll Pty Ltd t/as Toll Express [2006] NSWADT 221 Purvis v State of New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92 Collier v Austin Health [2011] VSC 344 Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Limited v Reddrop [1984] 2 NSWLR 13 Marsden v HREOC & Coffs Harbour & District Ex-Servicemen & Women's Memorial Club Ltd [2000] FCA 1619 Haines v Leves (1987) 8 NSWLR 442 Toll Pty Ltd t/as Toll Express v Abdulrahman [2007] NSWADT 70 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Trevanion v Wyangala Country Club (No.2) [2013] NSWADT 27 Commissioner of Police v Mooney (No.3) [2004] NSWADTAP 22 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 456 Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2001) 112 FCR 182 Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388 Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd (1989) 29 FCE 217 Bonella v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Graham Smith (Applicant) Department of Education and Communities (Respondent) Representation: Counsel A Howell (Applicant) S Benson (Respondent) Moray and Agnew (Respondent) File Number(s): 121063
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate