NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mark Peter Wilson v Warren O'Rourke [2013] NSWSC 989 Hearing dates: 16 May 2013 Decision date: 30 July 2013 Before: Bellew J Decision: (1)The amended summons is dismissed. (2)The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: APPEAL - appeal from decision of Magistrate in the Local Court on a question of law - where plaintiff sued for damages for breach of agreement - where defendant pleaded a different agreement and alternatively pleaded that no agreement had been reached - where Magistrate found that the parties were not ad idem and that no agreement had been reached between them - whether Magistrate was in error in so finding in view of the pleadings - whether the Magistrate was obliged to inform the plaintiff of the possibility of such a finding prior to delivering judgment - whether the Magistrate's failure to do so constituted a denial of procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172 Australian Gas Light Company v the Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Limited (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Baird Textile Holdings Limited v Marks and Spencer PLC [2002] 1 All E R (Comm) 737 Banque Commerciale (SA) (in liq) v Aklul Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 Beveridge v Dontan Pty Limited (1991) 23 NSWLR 13 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Limited (1996) 186 CLR 389 Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alpha One Pty Limited (1994) 49 FCR 576 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 Loudoun-Shand and anor v Jadasi Investments Pty Limited (2007) NSWCA 316Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 Vale v Sutherland (2009) 237 CLR 638 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Peter Wilson - Plaintiff Warren O'Rourke - Defendant Representation: Mr T Stuart - Plaintiff Mr D A Allen - Defendant Proctor and Associates - Defendant File Number(s): 2012 / 302230 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9109 Date of Decision: 2012-09-03 00:00:00 Before: Magistrate T Keady
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate