NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Mulder [2013] NSWSC 993 Hearing dates: 15 July 2013 Decision date: 25 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: Applications for exclusion of property from the restraining order and from forfeiture are refused Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME - automatic forfeiture of property under restraining order - lawfully obtained funds transferred through bank account opened with false identification documents - whether property ought to be excluded from forfeiture - whether property instrument of unlawful activity - nature of property interest in bank accounts WORDS AND PHRASES - "instrument of unlawful activity" - "instrument of an offence" - "proceeds of crime" Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988 (Cth) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Caruana v DPP (Vic) [2011] VSC 658 DPP (NSW) v King [2000] NSWSC 394; (2000) 49 NSWLR 727 Studman v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 285; (2007) 177 A Crim R 34 The Commissioner of the Australia Federal Police [2012] NSWSC 1533 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff/Respondent) Jack Dennis Mulder (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P McGuire (Plaintiff) Mr G Jones (Defendant) Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Nyman Gibson Stewart File Number(s): 2011/37131
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate