NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kapoor v State Transit Authority of NSW [2013] NSWCA 242 Hearing dates: 23 July 2013 Decision date: 23 July 2013 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Meagher JA at [14] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - application for leave to appeal dismissed - no issue of principle Cases Cited: Kapoor v State Transit Authority of NSW [2010] NSWCA 143 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ameet Kapoor (Applicant) State Transit Authority of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented Applicant S Harben SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Self-represented Applicant Rankin Nathan, Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2012/172670 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: Ameet Kapoor v State Transit Authority of NSW Date of Decision: 2012-05-04 00:00:00 Before: Bozic DCJ File Number(s): DC 2004/187626
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate