NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ryan v R; Coulter v R [2013] NSWCCA 175 Hearing dates: 11 April 2013 Decision date: 29 July 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1]; Price J at [83]; Harrison J at [84] Decision: Helen Ryan: (i) Leave granted to appeal against sentence; (ii) Appeal dismissed. Coralie Coulter: (i) Appeal against conviction dismissed; (ii) Leave granted to appeal against sentence; (iii) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - murder - conviction - leave required under r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules to argue sole ground of appeal - whether error in failing to leave partial defence under s 421 of the Crimes Act 1900 to the jury - no evidence which required s 421 issue to be left to jury - leave to argue ground refused - appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - murder - application for leave to appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive - no error found - leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - murder - application for leave to appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive - whether error in departure from the standard non-parole period - whether error in findings relating to appellant's prospects of rehabilitation - whether insufficient attention given to mitigating factors in s 21A(3) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - whether error in not adequately disclosing reasons for exceeding non-parole period - no error found - leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Rules Surveillance Devices Act 2007 Cases Cited: Barton v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 164 Braysich v The Queen [2011] HCA 14; 243 CLR 434 Des Rosiers v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 16 Fingleton v The Queen [2005] HCA 34; 227 CLR 166 Goebel-McGregor v R [2006] NSWCCA 390 Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20; 124 CLR 107 R v Braham (1994) 73 A Crim R 353 R v Ceniccola [2011] NSWSC 302 R v Chen (2003) 138 A Crim R 433 R v Holyoak (1995) 82 A Crim R 502 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2009/282687 Helen Kay Ryan (Appellant) Regina (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate