NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Boutros v Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 246 Hearing dates: 29 July 2013 Decision date: 01 August 2013 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: (1) The applicant's notice of motion filed 18 July 2013 be dismissed. (2) The applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of the motion. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - actions on judgments - stay of orders - r 51.44 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - judicial sale - ancillary orders for possession subsequently made - whether arguable case for appeal Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak [2009] NSWCA 130 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Australian Hardboards Limited v Hudson Investment Group [2007] NSWCA 104; 70 NSWLR 201 Guardian Mortgages Pty Ltd v Miller [2004] NSWSC 1236; 12 BPR 98145 Harden Shire Council v Richardson [2012] NSWSC 622 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd [2002] NSWCA 383; 55 NSWLR 737 King Investment Solutions v Hussain [2005] NSWSC 1076; 13 BPR 98296 Mills v Lewis (1983) 3 BPR 9421 Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206 Prior v Simeon [2010] WASC 382 Prior v Simeon (No 2) [2011] WASC 61 Re Gordon (1889) 61 LT (NS) 299 Vaughan v Dawson [2008] NSWCA 169 Texts Cited: Wade, "An Equitable Mortgagee's Right to Possession" (1955) 71 Law Quarterly Review 204 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Malke Boutros (Applicant) Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Westpac Banking Corporation (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Allen (Applicant) M W Young (First Respondent) M Wirth (Second Respondent) Solicitors: Chidiac Legal (Applicant) Bransgroves Lawyers (First Respondent) Kemp Strang (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/218731 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Nationwide Capital Pty Ltd v Boutros Constructions Pty Ltd and others [2013] NSWSC 976 Date of Decision: 2013-07-09 00:00:00 Before: McDougall J File Number(s): 2011/198240
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate