NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shannongrove Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority [2013] NSWCCA 179 Hearing dates: 16 May 2013 Decision date: 05 August 2013 Before: Basten ACJ at [1]; Hall J at [42]; Barr AJ at [43] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal in respect of the first charge. (2) Dismiss the appeal in respect of the conviction on the second charge. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction in Land and Environment Court - whether appellant transported waste to place not lawfully used as waste facility - appellant transported liquid by-product from recycling facility to farm - liquid injected into soil as fertiliser - whether liquid was "waste" - waste defined to include "unwanted or surplus" substance - whether liquid ceased to be waste once loaded for transport to willing recipient - Act created certain exceptions -proposed construction would render exceptions futile - Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), s 143
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - construction of "waste" - offence relating to transportation of waste - consideration of text - definition of waste amended between two charge periods - special definition of waste applicable to first charge period - comparison of special and general definitions - consideration of scope of offence - preferring construction would not render statutory exceptions futile - reference to objects of Act - whether general objects assist in construing particular words - proper approach to use of extrinsic materials - Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 34
WORDS AND PHRASES - "waste" - Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), s 143 Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5AA, 5AB, 5AE Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), ss 3, 5, 48, 115, 143; Sch 1, Pt 3 Interpretation Act 1987(NSW), ss 33, 34 Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1997] HCA 2; 187 CLR 384 at 408 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; 87 ALJR 98 Environmental Protection Authority v Terrace Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCA 180 Harrison v Melhem [2008] NSWCA 67; 72 NSWLR 380 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; 246 CLR 379 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 35 Texts Cited: Pearce and Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, (7th ed, 2011), Ch 4
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate