NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v CARROLL, Guy Michael [2013] NSWSC 1031 Hearing dates: 24 & 25 July 2013 Decision date: 26 July 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hall J Decision: Application for exclusion of identification evidence refused Catchwords: EVIDENCE - admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings - identification of an accused person in an out-of-court identification by array of photographs provided by police - where witness had previously given a description of the accused to police as having, among other features, tattoos and tattoos up to the neck prior to formal identification process - where witness said to have observed and interacted with the accused for some time before and after participating in subject offences - where witness both observed and spoke with the accused on subsequent occasion whilst in custody - whether observation and interaction with the accused on second occasion resulted in "displacement effect" - the conversation and meeting with the accused on second occasion is more accurately characterised as recognition of a person the witness was previously involved with capable of re-enforcing the original mental image of the person - array of photographs compiled by software which randomly selected photographs from a database that share "parameters of likeness" to photograph of the accused taken soon after date of subject offences - array of photographs included some photos exhibiting tattoos - a sound basis existed upon which the array of photographs was compiled - probative value of identification evidence not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the accused - application for the exclusion of the identification evidence under ss 135 and 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 refused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Alexander v R (1981) 145 CLR 395 Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52 Festa v R (2001) 208 CLR 593 Knight v Brown [2004] 183 FLR 135 R v Blick [2000] NSWCCA 61; [2000] 111 A Crim R 326 R v Fisher [2001] NSWCCA 380 R v Marshall (2000) 113 A Crim R 190 R v Nguyen [2003] NSWSC 1068 THD v R [2010] 200 A Crim R 106 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Guy Michael Carroll (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P McGrath (Crown) P Strickland SC (Accused) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Bell Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2010/299363
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate