NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dank v Whittaker (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1064 Hearing dates: 6 August 2013 Decision date: 09 August 2013 Before: McCallum J Decision: Rulings as to form and capacity of imputations relied upon by plaintiff; some imputations liable to be struck out; parties directed to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with reasons Catchwords: DEFAMATION - imputations - whether capable of arising - whether bad in form Cases Cited: Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52 Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: 2013/157114 Stephen Dank (plaintiff) Paul Whittaker (first defendant) Dr Peter Larkins (second defendant) Dr Tricia Kavanagh (third defendant) Darren Kane (fourth defendant) Rebecca Wilson (fifth defendant) James Hooper (sixth defendant) Josh Massoud (seventh defendant)
2013/157118 Stephen Dank (plaintiff) Nationwide News Pty Ltd (defendant)
2013/184586 Stephen Dank (plaintiff) Paul Whittaker (first defendant) Yoni Bashan (second defendant) Professor Kenneth Ho (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate