NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Singh v R [2013] NSWCCA 186 Hearing dates: 2 August 2013 Decision date: 02 August 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1]; Price J at [9]; R A Hulme J at [10] Decision: (i) Grant leave to appeal; (ii) Appeal against conviction on each count upheld; (iii) Each conviction quashed; (iv) Each count remitted to the District Court to be dealt with according to law. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - Crown concession - appellant mistakenly convicted and sentenced for offence pursuant to s 111(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 contrary to plea agreement made between appellant and Crown - appellant ought to have been convicted and sentenced under s 111(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 - plea to s 111(3) charge not a true acknowledgement of appellant's guilt - conviction set aside - convictions on remaining counts also set aside as being tainted by error - matter remitted to District Court to be dealt with according to law Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gurwinder Singh (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Phelps (Appellant) T Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: O'Brien Solicitors (Appellant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/323284 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-09-08 00:00:00 Before: Berman J File Number(s): 2009/323284
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate