NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Singtel Optus v Almad [2013] NSWSC 1098 Hearing dates: 05/08/2013 Decision date: 05 August 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Grant leave to withdraw admission. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - pleadings - application to amend - withdrawal of admission Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Drabsch v Switzerland General Insurance Co Limited (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, Santow J, 16 October 1996) Maile v Rafiq [2005] NSWCA 410 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Optus Networks Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Optus Administration Pty Ltd (Third Plaintiff) Almad Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Sumo Distribution and Storage Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Leon Mark Curtis (Third Defendant) Craig Hasler (Fourth Defendant) PJC333 Pty Limited (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Stoljar SC / DJA Mackay (Plaintiffs) BW Rayment QC / J T Johnson / IJ King (First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants) Second Defendant (Unrepresented) Solicitors: Minter Ellison (Plaintiffs) MCW Lawyers (First, Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants) Second Defendant (Unrepresented) File Number(s): 2011/139541
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate