NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jenman v McIntyre [2013] NSWSC 1100 Hearing dates: 6 August 2012 Decision date: 14 August 2013 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application for leave to continue proceedings against second defendant in liquidation refused; parts of defence and particulars struck out; first defendant's application for further discovery allowed. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - whether plaintiff should have leave to continue proceedings against company in liquidation - factors relevant to exercise of Court's discretion - defences - whether adequately particularised Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500(2) Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: Altinova Nominees Pty Ltd v Leveraged Capital Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(in liq)(No 2) [2009] FCA 42 Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 1 WLR 579 Channel Seven Adelaide v Manock [2007 HSC 60; 241 ALR 468 Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; 210 CLR 575 Gross v Weston [2007] NSWCA 1 Maher v Taylor [1984] 1 NSWLR 231 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Neil Jenman (plaintiff) Jamie McIntyre (first defendant) 21st Century Academy Ltd (in liquidation)(second defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Schoff SC, C Amato (plaintiff) J Castelan, L Brown (first defendant) Solicitors: Slater & Gordon (plaintiff) Black & White Legal (defendants) File Number(s): 2010/325331 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate