NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AP v R [2013] NSWCCA 189 Hearing dates: 6 August 2013 Decision date: 16 August 2013 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; RA Hulme J at [32]; Button J at [33] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - whether trial judge put defence case to jury - objection not taken at trial - substance of defence case in fact put to jury - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Condon (1995) 83 A Crim R 335 FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174; (2003) 139 A Crim R 340 R v Germakian [2007] NSWCCA 373; (2007) 70 NSWLR 467 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 RPS v R [2000] HCA 3; (2000) 199 CLR 620 Tekely v R; Nagle v R [2007] NSWCCA 75 Wong v R [2009] NSWCCA 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AP (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Taylor (Applicant) H Wilson (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/12606 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-08-02 00:00:00 Before: Neilson DCJ File Number(s): 2009/12606
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate