NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RP v R [2013] NSWCCA 192 Hearing dates: 2 August 2013 Decision date: 22 August 2013 Before: Simpson J at [1] Price J at [2] RA Hulme J at [34] Decision: Catchwords: Criminal Law - sentencing - indecent assault contrary to s 76 Crimes Act 1900 (now repealed) - whether error in assessment of objective seriousness - whether too much weight afforded to victim impact statement - whether sentence manifestly excessive - re sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 s 66A, s 61J, s 66L, s 61M(2), s 91H(2), s 76 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3) Cases Cited: Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Nelson v R [2007] NSWCCA 221 O'Kell v R [2013] NSWCCA 162 Ollis v R [2011] NSWCCA 155 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610; [1998] HCA 57 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Berg (2004) 41 MVR 399; [2004] NSWCCA 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RP (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Brassil (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent) Solicitors:
Peter Murphy Solicitor (Applicant) Department of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/5716 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-02-06 00:00:00 Before: Armitage DCJ File Number(s): 2010/5716012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate