NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195 Hearing dates: 31 July 2013 Decision date: 28 August 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Johnson J at [1]; RA Hulme J at [1] Decision: 1. Crown appeal allowed. 2. Sentences imposed in the Supreme Court on 15 March 2013 are quashed. In their place: (a) For the offence of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, the Respondent is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 6 years commencing on 8 September 2010 and expiring on 7 September 2016 with a balance of term of 2 years and 1 month commencing on 8 September 2016 and expiring on 7 October 2018. (b) On the count of manslaughter, and taking into account the offence on the Form 1, the Respondent is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 12 years commencing on 8 September 2011 and expiring on 7 September 2023, with a balance of term of 4 years and 2 months commencing on 8 September 2023 and expiring on 7 November 2027. 3. The earliest date upon which the Respondent will be eligible for release on parole is 8 September 2023. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown sentence appeal - pleas of guilty - manslaughter and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - excessive self-defence manslaughter - victim a police officer engaged in lawful execution of duty - execution of search warrant - Respondent shoots at and wounds victim with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm - Respondent believes unreasonably that victim and other police not genuine police - other police officer discharges firearm in response inflicting fatal injury to victim - objective seriousness of offences - errors established concerning assessment of objective seriousness of both offences - error in imposing entirely concurrent sentences - sentences manifestly inadequate - aggravating factor that victim a police officer acting in execution of duty - importance of specific and general deterrence - seriousness of possess prohibited firearm offence taken into account on Form 1 for manslaughter offence - Respondent resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: AB v R [2013] NSWCCA 160 Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Arvanitidis [2008] VSCA 189; 202 A Crim R 300 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hanania v R [2012] NSWCCA 220 Hejazi v R [2009] NSWCCA 282; 217 A Crim R 151 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 McIntyre v R [2009] NSWCCA 305; 198 A Crim R 549 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v AZ [2011] NSWCCA 43; 205 A Crim R 222 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Burton [2008] NSWCCA 128 R v Hamilton (1993) 66 A Crim R 575 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Jarrold [2010] NSWCCA 69 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 77 NSWLR 7 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 R v Mobbs [2005] NSWCCA 371 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWSC 197 R v Penisini [2004] NSWCCA 339 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170; 75 NSWLR 307 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 Re Attorney General's Application Under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No. 2 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 515; 137 A Crim R 196 Re Attorney General's Application Under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No. 1 of 2002) [2002] NSWCCA 518; 56 NSWLR 146 The Queen v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49; 219 A Crim R 550 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Philip Nguyen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms N Noman SC (Appellant) Mr H Ledinh, Solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Ledinh Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/300562 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: R v Nguyen [2013] NSWSC 197 Date of Decision: 2013-03-15 00:00:00 Before: Fullerton J File Number(s): 2010/300562
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate