NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maraache v R [2013] NSWCCA 199 Hearing dates: 1 July 2013 Decision date: 03 September 2013 Before: Emmett JA at [1]; Fullerton and Schmidt JJ at [86]. Decision: The Court orders that: 1. Leave to appeal be granted. 2. The appeal be allowed and the conviction be quashed. 3. There be a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - conduct of judge - adequacy of summing up to jury - whether defence case adequately put to jury - where no objection taken by defence at trial Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 112(3), 349(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 161 Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Cases Cited: Broadhurst v R [1964] AC 441 Domican v R [1992] HCA 13; (1992) 173 CLR 555 El-Jalkh v R [2009] NSWCCA 139 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Tomazos (Court of Criminal Appeal, 6 August 1979, unreported) R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 TKWJ v R [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Walid Maraache (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Coady (Appellant) J Girdham SC (Respondent) Solicitors: S E O'Connor (Appellant) S Kavanagh Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/132250 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-02-08 00:00:00 Before: Neilson DCJ File Number(s): 2010/0132250
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate