NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stankovic v Namul Pty Limited [2013] NSWCA 276 Hearing dates: 27 August 2013 Decision date: 27 August 2013 Before: Meagher JA, Barrett JA, Tobias AJA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - no question of general principle arising - no ground of appeal shown - respondent's title to land unimpeachable - short form reasons appropriate Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900, s 42 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 45(4) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1970, rule 51.55 Cases Cited: Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council (No 3) [2012] FCA 523 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milovan Stankovic (Appellant) Namul Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented Appellant M W Sneddon/C A Alexander (Respondent) Solicitors: Self-represented Appellant McLaughlin & Riordan (Respondent) File Number(s): CA2013/50343; CA2013/99410 Decision under appeal Citation: Namul Pty Ltd v Milovan Stankovic [2013] NSWSC 115 Date of Decision: 2013-02-14 00:00:00 Before: Rein J File Number(s): SC 2013/34311
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate