NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Samimi v Seyedabadi; Seyedabadi v Samimi [2013] NSWCA 279 Hearing dates: 26 August 2013 Decision date: 28 August 2013 Before: McColl JA Decision: Extension of time motion: (1) Extend the time for the cross-appellant to file and serve his notice of cross-appeal until 5pm on 4 September 2013. (2) Cross-appellant to pay the costs of the application. Freezing order notice of motion: See paragraphs [90] and [91] [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: INJUNCTIONS - application for freezing order - whether applicant has a good arguable case - whether danger that existing costs judgment or prospective judgment would be unsatisfied - UCPR 25.11, 25.14
PROCEDURE - extension of time to file and serve notice of cross-appeal - UCPR 51.17 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995 Home Building Act 1989 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Aquasun Pty Ltd v Coverdale Ram Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1146 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; (1999) 198 CLR 380 Finn v Carelli [2007] NSWSC 261 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Frigo v Culhaci [1998] NSWCA 88 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v District Court of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 324; (2004) 50 ACSR 380 Nanschild v Pratt [2011] NSWCA 85 Newcastle City Council v Caverstock Group Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 249; (2008) 163 LGERA 83 Ninemia Maritime Corporation v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG 'The Niedersachsen' [1983] 1 WLR 1412; [1984] 1 All ER 398 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 Richards v Cornford (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 134 SG v Director of Public Prosecution (NSW) [2003] NSWCA 128 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] HCA 3; (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Tagget v Sexton [2009] NSWCA 91; (2009) 255 ALR 522 Tomasetti v Brailey [2012] NSWCA 6 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71 NSWLR 61 United Telecasters Sydney Ltd v Hardy (1991) 23 NSWLR 323 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Kamran Samimi - applicant/respondent Ali Seyedabadi - respondent/applicant Representation: Mr R P Freeman for applicant/respondent Mr M Auld for respondent/applicant Scarfone & Co for applicant/respondent Respondent/applicant: N/A File Number(s): CA 2013/95298 Decision under appeal Citation: Unreported Date of Decision: 2013-03-04 00:00:00 Before: Coorey DCJ File Number(s): DC 2008/317793
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate