NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Glanville v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1185 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27 August 2013 Decision date: 28 August 2013 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff's application for adjournment of hearing refused; proceedings stayed permanently Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for adjournment after 7 hearing days - where plaintiff claiming to be unable to attend court for completion of his cross-examination owing to acute stress - factors relevant to exercise of discretion to adjourn hearing - whether proceedings should alternatively be stayed or dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Glanville v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1143 Glanville v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1179 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: David Glanville (plaintiff) TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (first defendant) Tracie Grimshaw (second defendant) Kate Donnison (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Stewart (solicitor)(plaintiff) B McClintock SC, M Richardson (defendants) Solicitors: Stewart & Associates (plaintiff) Johnson Winter Slattery (first, second and third defendants) File Number(s): 2011/95169 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate