NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wienand v R [2013] NSWCCA 202 Hearing dates: 15 July 2013 Decision date: 30 August 2013 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] McCallum J at [46] Schmidt J at [50] Decision: 1. In relation to grounds of appeal a. and b. leave to appeal refused. 2. In relation to ground of appeal c., leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - supply a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug - whether sentence manifestly excessive - parity - sentence of co-offender reduced by Court of Criminal Appeal - whether necessary to reduce applicant's sentence - no basis for justifiable sense of grievance - different subjective case and higher position in drug supply hierarchy. Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - s25(2) Cases Cited: Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 23 Dinsdale v R [2008] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hill v R [2012] NSWCCA 265 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Regina v Wei Pan [2005] NSWCCA 114 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Christopher Wienand - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms S Kluss - Applicant Ms V Lydiard - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/401944 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-08-10 00:00:00 Before: Sorby DCJ File Number(s): 2010/401944
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate