NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Orrock [2013] NSWDC 160 Hearing dates: 16/01/2013 - 29/01/2013 Decision date: 31 January 2013 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: 1. Sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years, non-parole period of 18 months. 2. Compensation orders made. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Guilty Plea - offence Intentionally Destroy Property by Fire - S195 (1)(b) Crimes Act - Newtown police truck destroyed by fire - offender relied on non-exculpatory necessity - to avoid public perception that he or his tattoo parlour connected with police - outlaw motorcycle gang connection during spate of drive-by shootings in Sydney - evidence accepted and thus moral culpability and objective criminality reduced - general and specific deterrence nonetheless important - spontaneous offence, no planning - good prospects of rehabilitation - special circumstances found - first time in prison, pre-trial custody served in two blocks after DPP appealed against Local Court decision to grant bail. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s195 (1) (b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - 21A (3) (d) Suitors Fund Act 1951 Cases Cited: R v Tiknius [2011] NSWCCA R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Category: Sentence Parties: The Crown Scott Allen Orrock (Offender) Representation: Mr. C. Patrick (Crown) Mr. D. Provera (Offender) Ms. E. Sercombe (DPP) Mr. M. Heffernan (Offender) File Number(s): 2012/127175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate