NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wondal v ING Bank (Australia) Ltd [2013] NSWCA 286 Hearing dates: 22 August 2013 Decision date: 22 August 2013 Before: McColl JA [1]; Leeming JA [2] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: Application for leave to appeal from summary dismissal - application filed substantially out of time - proposed appeal devoid of merit - leave refused Legislation Cited: Moratorium Act 1932 Moratorium (Amendment) Act 1968 Real Property Act 1900 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Susiany Wondal (Applicant) (In Person) ING Bank Australia Ltd (First Respondent) Gadens Lawyers Sydney Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: AC Casselden (First and Second Respondents) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (First and Second Respondents) File Number(s): 2012/307760 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Date of Decision: 2012-09-06 00:00:00 Before: Macready AsJ File Number(s): 2011/348007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate