NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Loftex Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 1165 Hearing dates: 22 July, 9 August 2013 Decision date: 30 August 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: 1. The objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards to compliance with the development standard in cl 20(2) of North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001 is upheld. 2. Development Application DA449/12 for the demolition of four detached dwellings and construction of a five storey residential flat building at 66-70A Atchison Street Crows Nest is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A. 3. The exhibits are returned except for exhibits A, B, 3, and 5. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - Residential Flat Building - Landscaped area requirement - SEPP 1 Objection - New local environmental plan published but not yet commenced Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2001 North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 Cases Cited: Loftex Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2013] NSWLEC 1143 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446 Liberty Investments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2009] NSWLEC 7 Legal & General Life of Australia Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1989) 68 LGRA 192 Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 1302 Maygood Australia Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2013] NSWLEC1127 Colley v Futurebrand FHA Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 291 Terrace Towers Holdngs Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195 Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472 Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (2000) 107 LGERA 363 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Loftex Pty Ltd (Applicant) North Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms A Hemmings (Applicant) Ms J Bridge, Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Applicant) Mr C Drury, Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10233 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate