NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Phillip Seeto v Kim Yum Bong Seeto & Ors [2013] NSWSC 1232 Hearing dates: 26, 27 August 2013 Decision date: 28 August 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: Plaintiff granted extension of time to bring family provision proceedings. Wiley Park property designated as notional estate of the deceased. An order for provision by way of a legacy to the plaintiff in the sum of $400,000. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - deceased died in 1998 - leaving his estate to a corporate trustee of a family trust - deceased's wife died in 2013 - deceased's younger son and executor in control of the family trust - deceased's older son brings an out of time application under Family Provision Act 1982 - plaintiff has no contact with his parents for 10 years - dispute as to the extent of family reconciliation - whether "sufficient cause" shown within Family Provision Act s 16(3) for application not having been made within time - plaintiff believed that his father's estate passed to his mother - whether executor aware of and contributed to the plaintiff's belief and remained silent - whether plaintiff was misled - whether prejudice due to delay - estate distributed - whether Family Provision Act 28(5)(d) "special circumstances" exist to justify making an order designating notional estate - whether plaintiff left without adequate provision - whether an order for provision should be made. Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Cases Cited: Bearns v Bearns-Hayes (unreported 6 May 1997) Zirkler v McKinnon [2002] NSWSC 285 John v John [2010] NSWSC 937 Campbell v Chabert-McKay [2010] NSWSC 859 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Re Fulop (dec'd) (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Vigolo v Bostin [2005] HCA 11; (2005) 221 CLR 191 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 Anderson v Teboneras [1990] VR 527 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Phillip Seeto Defendants: Kim Yum Bong (Raymond) Seeto, Wing On Investments Pty Limited Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: M Gorrick Defendant: L Ellison SC Solicitors: Plaintiff: Vincent Butcher Defendants: Warren Smith, Macpherson + Kelley Lawyers (Sydney) File Number(s): 2011/405719
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate