NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Getex Pty Limited v Reed Business Information Pty Limited and ors [No 2] [2013] NSWSC 1271 Hearing dates: Written submissions dated 2 September 2013 Decision date: 06 September 2013 Before: Bellew J Decision: 1.The second defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed; 2.The second defendant, if qualified, is to be granted a certificate pursuant to the Suitors Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs in (1) above; 3.The plaintiff is to pay the second defendant's costs of the cross-appeal, as agreed or assessed; 4.The plaintiff, upon satisfactory proof that it has a paid up share capital of less than $200,000.00, is to be granted a certificate pursuant to the Suitors Fund Act 1951, in respect of the costs in (3) above; 5.The costs of the entirety of the proceedings in the Local Court are to be at the discretion of the Magistrate. Catchwords: COSTS - where plaintiff successful on appeal from decision of Magistrate - where second defendant successful on cross -appeal - where proceedings remitted for further determination by the Magistrate - whether plaintiff entitled to the entirety of the costs of the appeal - whether the costs of the proceedings in the Local Court should follow the event of the further hearing Legislation Cited: Suitor's Fund Act 1951 Cases Cited: Brittain v Commonwealth (No. 2) [2004] NSWCA 427 Brownlie v Overend [1979] VR 283 Getex Pty Limited v Reed Business Information Pty Limited and ors [2013] NSWSC 1161 Jones v Richards (1899) 15 TLR 398 Monie v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 15\ Stewart v McKinley (1885) 11 VLR 802 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff - Getex Pty Limited 1st defendant - Reed Business Information Pty Limited 2nd defendant - Jason North 3rd defendant - Local Court of New South Wales Representation: Mr A Blank - Plainitff Mr B Ilkovski - 2nd Defendant Horowitz and Bilinsky – Plaintiff Toomey Pegg – 2nd Defendant File Number(s): 2012 / 157814 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9109 Date of Decision: 2012-04-20 00:00:00 Before: Magistrate Gilmour
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate